Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210823
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '21 at 18:27
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 57.3 1-Core 112 2-Core 206 68% 125 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 142 48% 301 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1391) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.97% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 6.9 5% 14.1 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 1 2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.97% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT24B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 394 341 340 331 337 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 425 Write 396 Mixed 386 SusWrite 357 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 32.1 103% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 212 154% 199 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 126%
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 51GB free Firmware: MU02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 53 50 53 51 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 323 Write 277 Mixed 356 SusWrite 86.3 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 30.7 4K Mixed 22.2 74% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 175 130% 172 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB 7,581 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	39.3% Below average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 15.6 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 8.7 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 136 30% 136 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	732x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	481x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	635x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	577x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	218x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	199x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	172x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	234x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	175x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16