PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7D20 |
Motherboard | MSI B560M PRO (MS-7D20) (all builds) |
Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210909 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 04 '21 at 13:21 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
82.7%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 53 53 53 53 25 MB/s
|
33.5%
Below average
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
28GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 23 1.7 1.8 4.5 MB/s
|
19.3%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
30GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 6.9 6.7 6.8 6.6 6.6 MB/s
|
5.01%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
82.5%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-11400FIntel $116Bench 94%, 46,609 samples | 244x |
Core i5-10400FIntel $99Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 222x |
Core i5-11400Intel $134Bench 94%, 24,459 samples | 163x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 170x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 81x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 79x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $386 |