Asus Z170-P

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Z170-P (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180516
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '21 at 19:21
Run Duration	361 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 89.6 1-Core 115 2-Core 231 82% 145 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 629 62% 505 Pts	64-Core 613 38% 613 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3285) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Lighting 66.2 Reflection 67.9 Parallax 62.2 54% 65.4 fps	MRender 66.3 Gravity 68.9 Splatting 62.2 54% 65.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 631GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1786 1809 1820 1819 1804 1764 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	286% Outstanding	Read 1,741 Write 1,636 Mixed 1,412 SusWrite 1,800 371% 1,647 MB/s	4K Read 54.3 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 80.6 246% 82.8 MB/s	DQ Read 705 DQ Write 596 DQ Mixed 648 486% 650 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 286% Great: 488%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 0GB free Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 432 Write 382 Mixed 333 85% 382 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 88.4 4K Mixed 30.7 116% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 181 162% 245 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB 44,418 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 454GB free Firmware: M3CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 407 408 410 410 409 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 444 Write 407 Mixed 397 SusWrite 409 93% 414 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 94.3 4K Mixed 44.3 141% 53.8 MB/s	DQ Read 349 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 266 214% 303 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 123%
Kingston SUV400S37120G 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 927GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 168 170 169 170 170 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 151 Write 118 Mixed 78.8 SusWrite 167 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 102%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 937GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 133 133 134 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 134 Write 117 Mixed 70.9 SusWrite 133 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 84%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 882GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 9.4 9.3 9.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 28.6 Write 18.5 Mixed 20 SusWrite 11.6 25% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 18%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 444GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 9.4 9.3 9.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 28.9 Write 18.9 Mixed 20.6 SusWrite 11.7 25% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 23%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1.5TB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.3 9.2 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 28 Write 18.4 Mixed 20 SusWrite 14.6 26% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$40 98,777 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 21.5 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 30 SC Mixed 22.6 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 4,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	1,134x
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	920x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	522x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	548x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	535x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	289x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	194x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	161x
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $55Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	86x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	128x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBHyperX $169Bench 83%, 37,519 samples	123x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $531

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16