| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191113 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 03 '21 at 16:34 |
| Run Duration | 197 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 49% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.5%
Good
|
66% 119 Pts
|
57% 479 Pts
|
39% 631 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
125%
Outstanding
|
140% 165 fps
|
113% 142 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team T253X1240G 240GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 31 41 31 41 41 MB/s
|
30%
Below average
|
28% 130 MB/s
|
37% 19.9 MB/s
|
25% 60.9 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
211GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1730 1643 1639 1414 1397 1298 MB/s
|
285%
Outstanding
|
406% 1,811 MB/s
|
217% 73.3 MB/s
|
561% 734 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
80%
Very good
|
86% 30 GB/s
|
61% 21.3 GB/s
|
31% 130 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,978 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 866x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 714x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 543x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 454x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 423x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 402x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $323 |