Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200803
Uptime	5.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '21 at 11:28
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 50,446 User benchmarks, average bench 75% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 72.9 1-Core 127 2-Core 263 83% 154 Pts	4-Core 463 8-Core 699 72% 581 Pts	64-Core 693 43% 693 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 7350 455 User benchmarks, average bench 1% PowerColor(148C 7350) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.05% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.57 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.05% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg40zns256g NVMe KIOXIA 256GB 13,282 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10410105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1136 448 390 398 391 397 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	223% Outstanding	Read 1,556 Write 1,438 Mixed 1,286 SusWrite 527 269% 1,202 MB/s	4K Read 57.7 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 77.4 267% 95.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,277 DQ Write 794 DQ Mixed 673 599% 914 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 223% Great: 219%
Seagate BACKUP+ 1TB 316 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 581GB free Firmware: A905 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 89 90 90 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Read 104 Write 76 Mixed 58.9 SusWrite 89.3 60% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 66%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB 6,695 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 931GB free Firmware: AX1P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 113 113 113 113 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 109 Write 108 Mixed 34.9 SusWrite 113 66% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB 30,824 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	43% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 14 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 14 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 94.9 42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	331x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	324x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	282x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	224x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	192x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	171x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	163x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	66x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	59x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	60x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16