Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Mobile Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8783
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210728
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '21 at 09:16
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10885H 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 87.9 2-Core 138 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 445 46% 369 Pts	64-Core 694 43% 694 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 95%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 187,969 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 8783) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	4.53% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 7.2 Parallax 6.6 4% 6.3 fps	MRender 6.6 Gravity 3.2 Splatting 8.6 5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.53% Great: 6%
Nvidia Quadro T1000 with Max-Q Design 566 User benchmarks, average bench 36% HP(103C 8783) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1530 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.47 Performing below potential (41^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.3% Below average	Lighting 42.3 Reflection 46 Parallax 41.4 34% 43.2 fps	MRender 51.9 Gravity 41.1 Splatting 43.4 37% 45.5 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 39%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GB 17,828 User benchmarks, average bench 240% 374GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0NEXF SusWrite @10s intervals: 1233 872 868 873 857 822 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	231% Outstanding	Read 2,230 Write 1,946 Mixed 1,556 SusWrite 921 372% 1,663 MB/s	4K Read 55.2 4K Write 92 4K Mixed 62.7 213% 70 MB/s	DQ Read 512 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 443 327% 435 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 231% Great: 306%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GB 37,566 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 22.5 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 27.3 SC Mixed 20 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 106%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	324x
Quadro T2000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 39%, 1,016 samples	143x
Quadro T1000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 36%, 566 samples	100x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	84x
KIOXIA 1TBKxg60znv1t02Bench 208%, 4,378 samples	79x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	78x

RAM
HMAA4GS6AJR8N-XN 1x31GBHynixBench 48%, 958 samples	69x
16ATF4G64HZ-3G2E2 1x31GBMicronBench 49%, 283 samples	46x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	42x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16