Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HE_TUF506HE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HE_TUF506HE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HE
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211005
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '21 at 05:09
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 52.1
1-Core 49.5
2-Core 95.9
40% 65.8 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 323
31% 258 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 13EC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.43% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 40
Parallax 11.6
8% 20.3 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 13.1
Splatting 10.3
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.43%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,005
Write 1,597
Mixed 375
291% 1,326 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 99
4K Mixed 60.6
202% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,010
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 855
589% 745 MB/s
Poor: 165% Great: 330%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
63.4% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 21.1
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 7.9
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HE_TUF506HE Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HE_TUF506HE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback