Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5200-$50 13,848 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Memory 53 1-Core 39.6 2-Core 77.7 36% 56.8 Pts	4-Core 76.3 8-Core 76 10% 76.2 Pts	64-Core 64.6 4% 64.6 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 376C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.85% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 6.3 Parallax 5 4% 5.27 fps	MRender 6.5 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5.1 4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.85% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 240GB 5,061 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 20 19 55 76 76 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.8% Below average	Read 222 Write 216 Mixed 180 SusWrite 53.8 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 33.3 4K Mixed 22.2 74% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 23.6 DQ Write 45.9 DQ Mixed 28.4 23% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 19%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium E5700Intel $22Bench 36%, 20,872 samples	2x
Pentium E5200Intel $50Bench 36%, 13,848 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x

SSD
Blast 240GBPatriotBench 77%, 5,061 samples	1x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $22

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16