Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 L 640 2,030 User benchmarks, average bench 41% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	40% Below average	Memory 56.3 1-Core 70.6 2-Core 108 47% 78.4 Pts	4-Core 139 8-Core 136 18% 138 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 215A) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.47% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.7 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.47% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 173 173 193 202 207 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.2% Average	Read 217 Write 206 Mixed 205 SusWrite 192 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 26.9 4K Mixed 21.4 66% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 181 136% 181 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-G7 2x2GB 519 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 9.1 22% 7.77 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 21%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7 L 640IntelBench 41%, 2,030 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 21%, 1,324 samples	1x
HMT325S6BFR8C-G7 2x2GBHynixBench 24%, 519 samples	1x

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16