HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateDec 03 '21 at 03:00
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$272
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 73.4
1-Core 133
2-Core 262
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 827
85% 670 Pts
64-Core 810
54% 810 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$280
HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.9% Very good
Lighting 92
Reflection 89.7
Parallax 85.1
74% 88.9 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 82.2
Splatting 69.2
69% 85.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 82%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$111
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1237 1322 1156 923 780 721 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,526
Write 1,635
Mixed 1,295
SusWrite 1,023
308% 1,370 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 68.2
224% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,464
DQ Write 644
DQ Mixed 1100
803% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 227%
This bench: 240%
Great: 404%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
724GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 180 183 182 180 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 166
Mixed 95.6
SusWrite 181
118% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 35: 4R 2G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 41% 37 246 174 144 27" 1920 1080 ACR064D Acer XF270H B
Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 9,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $289Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-12400F $184Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $248Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback