Teclast tPAD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardTeclast tPAD  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 21:05
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core M-5Y10c
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 56.8
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 112
46% 77.5 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 154
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300
Intel(8086 161E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 4.9
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 5.7
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 64GB SSD 64GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0213E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 147 144 115 56 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 337
Write 148
Mixed 163
SusWrite 110
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 7.8
51% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 53.2
66% 116 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.6
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 15.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical tPAD Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Teclast tPAD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback