Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 83.5 1-Core 61.3 2-Core 108 54% 84.1 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 307 30% 245 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3732) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.2% Poor	Lighting 35.6 Reflection 39 Parallax 40.3 29% 38.3 fps	MRender 36.6 Gravity 37.1 Splatting 26.2 26% 33.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$113 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 707GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 353 359 350 363 384 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 375 Write 352 Mixed 308 SusWrite 364 79% 350 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 62 4K Mixed 34.5 115% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 34.7 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 54.9 47% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 128%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB 11,560 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA13.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 59 59 70 63 72 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.2% Poor	Read 178 Write 109 Mixed 113 SusWrite 77.2 27% 119 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 22.4 4K Mixed 9.5 50% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 14.3 DQ Write 22 DQ Mixed 17.1 13% 17.8 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 102%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 85GB free Firmware: 1H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 95 80 59 61 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 98.8 Write 102 Mixed 63.4 SusWrite 79.7 63% 86 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0- M378B5773CH0- M378B5173QH0- M378B5773CH0- Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A M378B5773CH0- Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A M378B5773CH0- 24GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	77.6% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 33.7 MC Mixed 28 85% 29.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12.2 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	15x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	11x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
HG5d Q Series 256GBToshiba $225Bench 82%, 3,223 samples	4x
840 250GBSamsungBench 77%, 2,100 samples	4x

RAM
M393B5170EH1- 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 40 samples	9x
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	6x
HMT351U7CFR8A 4x4GBHynixBench 89%, 39 samples	4x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16