Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	4.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$260 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 97.4 2-Core 168 72% 119 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 764 66% 566 Pts	64-Core 769 48% 769 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Intel(8086 2015) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	4.31% Terrible	Lighting 7.5 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 8.8 6% 8.83 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 1 Splatting 1 1% 1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.31% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Afox SD250 512GN 512GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 401GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 57 50 61 62 62 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 437 Write 379 Mixed 349 SusWrite 92.9 70% 315 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 99.8 4K Mixed 24.3 128% 51.1 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 35.2 82% 165 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMSO480E82-2666E 2x8GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	83.3% Excellent	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 23.4 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 24.2 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	485x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	478x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	457x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,363x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	486x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	354x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16