| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 5.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 95.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H510M-HVS (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20210723 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 01 '21 at 21:36 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | MDA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-10105F
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
|
84.7%
Excellent
|
87% 155 Pts
|
66% 534 Pts
|
39% 636 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 0541) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
|
5.81%
Terrible
|
6% 8.57 fps
|
6% 7.87 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKKB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 451 454 457 461 454 MB/s
|
95.6%
Outstanding
|
94% 415 MB/s
|
129% 46.9 MB/s
|
161% 243 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
217GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 154 153 156 156 156 MB/s
|
89.7%
Excellent
|
103% 140 MB/s
|
221% 1.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KF3000C15D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.7%
Good
|
69% 24 GB/s
|
54% 18.9 GB/s
|
61% 65.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H510M-HVS Builds (Compare 727 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H510M-HVS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 170x |
| Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 155x |
| Core i3-10105FIntelBench 82%, 14,843 samples | 79x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 82x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 66x |
| RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 58x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $281 |