Fujitsu CELSIUS M470-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 23 months ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M470-2  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2778-C1
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 16:31
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3565
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 79
2-Core 151
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 395
40% 322 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 64
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 59.8
52% 62.3 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 65.5
Splatting 59.4
52% 63.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.9 3.5 4 4.9 148 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.7% Below average
Read 204
Write 192
Mixed 172
SusWrite 28
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 12.1
68% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 66.7
75% 126 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 78%
SSDPR-CL100-240 240GB
58GB free
Firmware: V3.35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 188 223 224 222 218 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.5% Above average
Read 242
Write 211
Mixed 195
SusWrite 211
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 14.9
77% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 23
50% 102 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 86%
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GB
47GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 134 151 69 64 77 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.2% Average
Read 243
Write 217
Mixed 144
SusWrite 112
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 25.5
68% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 151
125% 179 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10.1
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 10.3
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M470-2 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M470-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $397
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback