HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 15:15
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820QM-$275
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 186
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 470
43% 362 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000M
HP(103C 176C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 601 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 426.50
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 16.8
11% 15.4 fps
MRender 17.4
Gravity 17
Splatting 14.2
13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNS128GG4BBAA 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGTA0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 159 163 159 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 219
Write 86.4
Mixed 127
SusWrite 147
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 16.1
64% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 13.1
DQ Write 30.6
DQ Mixed 17.1
14% 20.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 40%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
185GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 316 312 301 298 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 377
Write 410
Mixed 353
SusWrite 318
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 43
140% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 40.5
DQ Write 95
DQ Mixed 54.3
45% 63.3 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 129%
Intel SSDMAEXC024G3H 24GB
5GB free
Firmware: 9CV10379
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 137
Write 91.9
Mixed 102
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 21.9
76% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 55.9
DQ Mixed 27.6
24% 35 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9DECBOIE-TATP Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB Elpida EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.3% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.4
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback