PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z87 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160412 |
Uptime | 2.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 01 '21 at 13:54 |
Run Duration | 264 Seconds |
Run User | SAU-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.1%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 31 23 23 24 27 MB/s
|
54.2%
Above average
|
|||
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
160GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 215 293 266 266 289 MB/s
|
50%
Above average
|
|||
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
41GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 48 51 50 50 50 MB/s
|
24.3%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
863GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 105 114 109 106 113 MB/s
|
52%
Above average
|
|||
JetFlash Transcend 64GB
56GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 33 32 28 34 MB/s
|
23.8%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
|
62.2%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples | 274x |
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples | 244x |
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 114x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 67x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 60x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 59x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $431 |