Asus ROG MAXIMUS XIII APEX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive354% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XIII APEX  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 01 '21 at 07:10
Run Duration381 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$265
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 86.4
1-Core 173
2-Core 303
102% 187 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 779
82% 659 Pts
64-Core 855
53% 855 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499
Nvidia(10DE 14B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
153% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 200
Parallax 197
184% 208 fps
MRender 235
Gravity 148
Splatting 120
132% 168 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 153%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2238 2369 423 351 391 395 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 2905
Write 2,491
Mixed 2,229
SusWrite 1028
484% 2,163 MB/s
4K Read 80.4
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 109
374% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,591
DQ Write 1,045
DQ Mixed 1254
953% 1,296 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 354%
Great: 389%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 474 474 476 475 476 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 413
Mixed 395
SusWrite 474
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 50
176% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 252
214% 314 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 118%
Great: 117%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 377 379 380 379 380 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 352
Write 360
Mixed 305
SusWrite 378
79% 349 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 34.2
112% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 221
171% 233 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 117%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
930GB free
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2327 2329 2334 2334 2343 855 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
383% Outstanding
Read 2,266
Write 2,351
Mixed 2,194
SusWrite 2087
502% 2,225 MB/s
4K Read 68.1
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 95.6
320% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,698
DQ Write 1,257
DQ Mixed 1,396
1,065% 1,450 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 383%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
931GB free
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2352 2342 2335 2332 2295 846 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
392% Outstanding
Read 2,416
Write 2,319
Mixed 2,226
SusWrite 2,084
510% 2,261 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 98.4
325% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1736
DQ Write 1,265
DQ Mixed 1,398
1,072% 1,466 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 392%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 29.5
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 26.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XIII APEX Builds (Compare 338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 212%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 214%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XIII APEX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,615
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback