Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700K-$236 198,859 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	Memory 88.1 1-Core 147 2-Core 288 95% 174 Pts	4-Core 569 8-Core 958 93% 763 Pts	64-Core 1,537 95% 1,537 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 104%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 39,219 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.34% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 142 Parallax 9.2 5% 52.3 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 12.4 9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.34% Great: 6%
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 462.96 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 144 Parallax 131 103% 134 fps	MRender 177 Gravity 112 Splatting 123 110% 137 fps
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 102%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB 553 User benchmarks, average bench 321% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1453 1357 1369 1343 1451 1298 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	275% Outstanding	Read 2,582 Write 1,962 Mixed 1,715 SusWrite 1,378 427% 1,910 MB/s	4K Read 57.9 4K Write 59.1 4K Mixed 60.2 196% 59.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,081 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 205 248% 464 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 275% Great: 399%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 462GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1756 1077 827 826 776 825 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	252% Outstanding	Read 2,563 Write 1,965 Mixed 1,712 SusWrite 1,014 405% 1,814 MB/s	4K Read 61.3 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 55.9 197% 59.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,122 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 196 248% 473 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 252% Great: 355%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 3TB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 418 419 411 441 404 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 439 Mixed 447 SusWrite 420 102% 453 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 49.9 4K Mixed 34.9 128% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 93.5 DQ Mixed 183 148% 219 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GVK 2x31.5GB 1,890 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.3% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 23.5 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 16.5 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 142%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 142%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	157x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	105x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 39,219 samples	93x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	66x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	52x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	37x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	52x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	50x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBKingstonBench 90%, 54,651 samples	42x

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $771

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16