Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	75.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20181102
Uptime	13.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '21 at 13:58
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 74.6 1-Core 114 2-Core 228 76% 139 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 806 77% 637 Pts	64-Core 1,021 63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 873A) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Lighting 94.6 Reflection 93.9 Parallax 87.4 77% 92 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 83.9 Splatting 74.7 73% 91.6 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 250GB 2,741 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 297 293 294 293 293 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Read 434 Write 383 Mixed 382 SusWrite 302 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 44.2 145% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 46.9 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 92.4 89% 133 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 126%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 882GB free Firmware: MS2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 182 178 177 179 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 191 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 179 105% 147 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 140% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905701-132.A00G 1x16GB 818 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.4% Below average	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 9 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 9.5 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 91.3 44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16