Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 945 12,746 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Memory 76.1 1-Core 45.4 2-Core 91.3 46% 70.9 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 183 23% 176 Pts	64-Core 181 11% 181 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% XFX(1682 2990) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Lighting 14.5 Reflection 13.6 Parallax 13 12% 13.7 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 11.5 Splatting 9.5 9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD 16,267 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 434GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900J13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 390 399 391 394 395 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 396 Write 388 Mixed 362 SusWrite 388 87% 384 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 21.3 4K Mixed 18.1 61% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 182 146% 202 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 96%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 3,362 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 12GB free, PID 00ee Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		4K Read 2.6 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CF8 Hynix HMT125U6AFP8C-G7 Hynix HMT125U6AFP8C-G7 M378B5673FH0-CF8 8GB 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.9% Poor	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 9.7 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 8.5 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 88.2 45% 88.2 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	36x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	32x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	32x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	26x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $334

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16