| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-D (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191016 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 30 '21 at 02:47 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 53% |
PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.2%
Good
|
72% 127 Pts
|
48% 364 Pts
|
21% 332 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Nvidia(10DE 12D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.2%
Above average
|
52% 66.9 fps
|
52% 63.9 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.6%
Poor
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
10% 3.47 GB/s
|
46% 87.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME H310M-D Builds (Compare 647 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 222x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 161x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 78x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 98x |
| UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples | 57x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 55x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $218 |