Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB_FX706HCB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB_FX706HCB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX706HCB
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211005
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateNov 30 '21 at 02:38
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 67.5
1-Core 163
2-Core 312
95% 181 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1,037
98% 815 Pts
64-Core 1,409
87% 1,409 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 144C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7247
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.2% Good
Lighting 80.8
Reflection 76.7
Parallax 68.7
66% 75.4 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 60.1
Splatting 60.1
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1470 988 824 834 828 840 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,925
Write 1,560
Mixed 1,388
SusWrite 964
327% 1,459 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 86.3
284% 98.3 MB/s
DQ Read 982
DQ Write 379
DQ Mixed 886
601% 749 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 255%
Great: 330%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 1TB
198GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1461 1483 924 354 372 331 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,292
Write 1,478
Mixed 1,371
SusWrite 821
280% 1,240 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 63.6
209% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,028
DQ Write 371
DQ Mixed 869
597% 756 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 198%
Great: 354%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.5 4.4 3.9 4.3 4.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
8.79% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 13.7
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 3.9
16% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.4
140% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.79%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
69.4% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 20.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 17.7
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB_FX706HCB Builds (Compare 790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB_FX706HCB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback