Asus PRIME A320M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-A (all builds)
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '21 at 01:53
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$102 38,959 User benchmarks, average bench 65% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 57.4 1-Core 112 2-Core 208 68% 126 Pts	4-Core 414 8-Core 408 55% 411 Pts	64-Core 401 25% 401 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B1) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Lighting 66.1 Reflection 69.5 Parallax 63.6 54% 66.4 fps	MRender 66.9 Gravity 69.5 Splatting 64.8 55% 67.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 430 Write 308 Mixed 300 77% 346 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 37.7 140% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 238 208% 310 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 751GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 1.9 2.3 2 2.1 2.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 94 Write 1.5 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 2.1 21% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 57%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB 8,938 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 30 30 29 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 32.1 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 29.8 42% 31.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2400 C16 Series 1x8GB 1,282 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.2% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 14.5 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 13 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 136 30% 136 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-A Builds (Compare 543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-A

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	68x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	60x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	40x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	38x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	30x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	13x
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	10x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $284

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16