Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 71.7 1-Core 74.8 2-Core 163 59% 103 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 495 50% 404 Pts	64-Core 485 30% 485 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1E39 A010) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	5.39% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 5.6 Parallax 6.8 5% 6 fps	MRender 6.6 Gravity 5.8 Splatting 11.8 7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.39% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
E12-512G-PHISON-SSD-B16-BB1 512GB 656 User benchmarks, average bench 182% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 806 347 250 229 242 253 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 728 Write 1,404 Mixed 954 SusWrite 354 195% 860 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 53.3 154% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 810 DQ Write 693 DQ Mixed 766 570% 756 MB/s
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 233%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB 73,050 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	44.9% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 12.3 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 97.6 41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	7x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	5x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	2x

SSD
E12-512G-PHISON-SSD-B16-BB1 512GBBench 182%, 656 samples	6x
E12-256G-PHISON-SSD-B16-BB1 256GBBench 153%, 253 samples	1x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	5x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 0443 RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 16GBHynixBench 75%, 50 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16