Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	6.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4960HQ 314 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	24.2% Poor	Memory 37.5 1-Core 19.3 2-Core 36.8 21% 31.2 Pts	4-Core 59.3 8-Core 205 14% 132 Pts	64-Core 472 29% 472 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M 13,088 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Apple(106B 0130) 2GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1254 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	6.53% Terrible	Lighting 7.1 Reflection 8.8 Parallax 10.9 6% 8.93 fps	MRender 10.9 Gravity 10.1 Splatting 8.7 8% 9.9 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.53% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Apple SM1024F 1TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: UXM6JA1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 407 422 435 429 462 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 103%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB 3,373 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 57GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 36 43 42 46 61 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 116 Write 55.6 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 43.3 84% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 3.4 205% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x484D54343147533641465238412D50422020 2x8GB 311 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	39% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 15.9 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.9 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 214 19% 214 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 750MNvidiaBench 8%, 13,088 samples	65x

SSD
SM0512F 500GBAppleBench 83%, 287 samples	31x
SM0512G PCIe 500GBAppleBench 162%, 1,474 samples	4x
SM0256G PCIe 251GBAppleBench 149%, 1,022 samples	2x

RAM
0x484D54343147533641465238412D50422020 2x8GBUnknownBench 63%, 311 samples	34x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	15x
0x 2x8GBUnknownBench 66%, 83 samples	14x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16