Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UBR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UBR (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X507UBR
Memory	2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200421
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '21 at 14:13
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	62%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 73.4 1-Core 77.2 2-Core 150 59% 100 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 271 34% 258 Pts	64-Core 277 17% 277 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia MX110 6,322 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 1A0E) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6231 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.72% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 10.4 Parallax 7.5 0% 6.07 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 8.2 Splatting 8.1 8% 9.4 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 2.72% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0B- 240GB 3,926 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 0.9 6.3 53 54 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 324 Write 269 Mixed 161 SusWrite 38.7 146% 198 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 166%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 790GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 74 76 73 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 75.7 Write 70.9 Mixed 43.4 SusWrite 73.3 48% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AO1P24HC4R1-BSIS Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60% Above average	MC Read 23.4 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 18.1 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 17.9 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UBR Builds (Compare 195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UBR

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	114x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	58x
Core i3-7020UIntelBench 40%, 28,454 samples	21x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	112x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	62x
HD Graphics 620IntelBench 4%, 8,599 samples	19x

SSD
SD9SN8W128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 3,521 samples	11x
SA400M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 70%, 27,523 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	62x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	16x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16