PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T3600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T3600 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190625 |
Uptime | 7.3 Days |
Run Date | Nov 28 '21 at 04:16 |
Run Duration | 196 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1607 0
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
49.8%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
Nvidia(10DE 139D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 195 159 146 138 124 MB/s
|
66.4%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
98GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 81 81 81 80 MB/s
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Seagate USB 3.0 Cable 240GB
29GB free, PID 5032
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 26 26 26 26 MB/s
|
27.2%
Poor
|
|||
Kingston DT Elite HS 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID 0015
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
8.12%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung-00CE M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
|
56.3%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,049x |
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $238Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 431x |
Xeon E5-1603 0IntelBench 60%, 3,589 samples | 236x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 162x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 124x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 116x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |