Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Notebook P65_P67RGRERA (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P65_P67RGRERA
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160127
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '21 at 12:41
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 80.5 1-Core 69.4 2-Core 136 58% 95.2 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 506 44% 375 Pts	64-Core 507 31% 507 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M 10,379 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Clevo(1558 6542) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.4% Average	Lighting 50.3 Reflection 57.9 Parallax 49.9 41% 52.7 fps	MRender 56.7 Gravity 52.9 Splatting 47.3 42% 52.3 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4L1QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 833 645 640 642 638 633 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	231% Outstanding	Read 2066 Write 1,806 Mixed 1,330 SusWrite 672 328% 1,468 MB/s	4K Read 49.5 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 68.3 223% 77.4 MB/s	DQ Read 920 DQ Write 766 DQ Mixed 850 635% 845 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 231% Great: 296%
Crucial M4 512GB-$74 4,600 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 324GB free Firmware: 040H SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 242 285 288 284 279 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Read 468 Write 280 Mixed 292 SusWrite 260 73% 325 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 83.1 4K Mixed 25.2 108% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 50.6 83% 158 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 81%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$132 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 129GB free Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 380 235 124 266 342 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Read 469 Write 419 Mixed 374 SusWrite 283 87% 386 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 83.7 4K Mixed 45.2 151% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 282 229% 324 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 1x16GB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.9% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 13.8 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 7.5 24% 8.33 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	156x
Core i7-6820HKIntelBench 69%, 20,362 samples	24x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	55x
GeForce GTX 980MNvidiaBench 39%, 10,379 samples	46x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	40x

SSD
850 EVO M.2 250GBSamsungBench 102%, 28,058 samples	25x
850 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 110%, 25,072 samples	14x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $250Bench 199%, 40,327 samples	6x

RAM
M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 20,956 samples	27x
16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 2x8GBMicronBench 69%, 6,021 samples	15x
HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 2,917 samples	14x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16