Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10210U 54,859 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 71.5 1-Core 106 2-Core 238 75% 139 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 517 58% 455 Pts	64-Core 391 24% 391 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 110,580 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 5079) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	3.77% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 8.1 6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.77% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon L8H-128V2G-HP 128GB 1,392 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2803 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 142 147 147 147 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Read 387 Write 147 Mixed 194 SusWrite 145 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 54.6 4K Mixed 13.6 58% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 151 124% 181 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB 54,121 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	43.1% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 11.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 14.1 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 98.1 41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 53%, 54,859 samples	3x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	3x

SSD
L8H-128V2G-HP 128GBLiteonBench 64%, 1,392 samples	1x
PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G-1001 256GBWDCBench 142%, 523 samples	1x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmt256gBench 104%, 1,245 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	2x
RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 16,227 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16