Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 82 1-Core 65.9 2-Core 154 60% 101 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 367 40% 319 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M 9,032 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 04CA) 1GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	2.85% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 1.8 3% 3.5 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 3.7 Splatting 2.8 3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.85% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31480GNTD 480GB 7,834 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 393GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 250 108 95 95 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 419 Write 244 Mixed 326 SusWrite 168 64% 289 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 24.9 88% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 289 DQ Mixed 194 168% 245 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB 25,458 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	55.8% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 17.6 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1,184x
GeForce GT 525MNvidiaBench 2%, 9,032 samples	346x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	278x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	83x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 24%, 8,698 samples	66x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	50x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $222

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $56	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16