Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 15:50
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$280
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 214
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 614
62% 489 Pts
64-Core 611
41% 611 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
Gigabyte(1458 404C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 206
Parallax 198
183% 210 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 154
Splatting 136
129% 162 fps
Poor: 131%
This bench: 158%
Great: 166%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$189
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 444 452 462 455 460 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 450
Mixed 412
SusWrite 450
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 52.2
174% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 117%
Great: 130%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$90
129GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 255 255 256 256 255 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 296
Mixed 314
SusWrite 274
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 55.1
189% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 232
210% 318 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 110%
Great: 115%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$80
72GB free
Firmware: 0K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 61 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 61.5
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 61.8
45% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 77%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$132
2TB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 229 234 229 228 234 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 244
Write 184
Mixed 94
SusWrite 224
136% 186 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1
252% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 134%
Great: 58%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB
346GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 41.7
Write 40.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 42.7
52% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 18.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 21: 3R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 15% 46 315 242 120 48.8" 5120 1440 SAM7053 LC49G95T
History: Score 17: 2R 1G 4B | Score 21: 3R 1G 3B
Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 5,739 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $295Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-12400F $184Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $245Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback