Asus F2A85-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
13 days ago, 13 days ago.
MotherboardAsus F2A85-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 06:38
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$380
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 157
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 282
37% 271 Pts
64-Core 279
19% 279 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$749
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.3% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 104
56% 79.5 fps
MRender 53.5
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 41.4
55% 55.2 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 60%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 512G 512GB
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 385 387 395 399 399 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 388
Mixed 353
SusWrite 388
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 38.9
131% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 245
187% 253 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$40
860GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 188 191 191 193 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 108
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 190
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
USB DISK 3.0 124GB
32GB free, PID 6400
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 200
Write 123
Mixed 140
185% 155 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 4.7
325% 6.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 57%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.2% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 10.4
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27C3 MX279
Typical F2A85-M PRO Builds (Compare 327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $168
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $300Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11400F $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback