Gigabyte GA-B365M GAMING HD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B365M GAMING HD (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190905
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '21 at 06:16
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 87.9 1-Core 113 2-Core 242 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 644 70% 556 Pts	64-Core 668 41% 668 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.5% Below average	Lighting 39.4 Reflection 36.9 Parallax 32.3 32% 36.2 fps	MRender 35.4 Gravity 41 Splatting 26.6 27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 120GB SSD 120GB 960 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117H Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 490 Write 380 Mixed 402 94% 424 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 46.7 179% 64.6 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 112 107% 166 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 889GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 7 0 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	7.45% Terrible	Read 24 Write 11.3 Mixed 4 SusWrite 1.7 7% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0 37% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 7.45% Great: 113%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB 4,404 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 21GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 39 39 39 39 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 144 Write 42.3 Mixed 31.7 SusWrite 36.4 68% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.4 58% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	77.7% Very good	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 23.1 79% 27.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 27.7 SC Mixed 23 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B365M GAMING HD Builds (Compare 874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365M GAMING HD

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	406x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	91x
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	42x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	105x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	79x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	74x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	41x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	38x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GBCorsairBench 44%, 13,628 samples	34x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 52,667 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $196

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16