Toshiba SATELLITE C660

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C660 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PWWHA
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111004
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '21 at 04:37
Run Duration	262 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	64%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron B800 2,662 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	34.8% Below average	Memory 56.6 1-Core 37.3 2-Core 78 36% 57.3 Pts	4-Core 78 8-Core 75.5 10% 76.8 Pts	64-Core 72.1 4% 72.1 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FC90) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.79% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.9 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.79% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GB 3,217 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 47 87 91 36 5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 437 Write 268 Mixed 117 SusWrite 82.4 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 15.1 37% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 39.1 DQ Write 47.5 DQ Mixed 160 88% 82.1 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F EBJ41UF8BDU0-DJ-F 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.6% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 15 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 6.4 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	73	12	9	60	15.5"	1366 768	LGD02DC

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C660 Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C660

CPU
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	120x
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	75x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	73x

GPU
GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples	174x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	168x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	71x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	53x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	43x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16