Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170407
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 02:55
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$361
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 89.7
1-Core 136
2-Core 255
92% 160 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 736
77% 603 Pts
64-Core 748
50% 748 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2632 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.4% Outstanding
Lighting 98.5
Reflection 142
Parallax 98.3
80% 113 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 145
Splatting 122
114% 130 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 116%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 120GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM50.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 24 24 25 9.2 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 474
Write 380
Mixed 347
SusWrite 40.1
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 34.7
144% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 93.6
DQ Mixed 41.3
68% 138 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 82%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB
36GB free
Firmware: 1201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 68 68 68 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 96.7
Write 93.5
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 68.2
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 74%
Seagate Slim BK 500GB
43GB free
Firmware: 0934
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 38.8
Write 41
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 41.4
28% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 60%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$80
254GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 100 101 101 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 113
Write 86
Mixed 96.3
SusWrite 99.9
73% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 76%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
54GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 94 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 88.7
Write 85.2
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 93.6
100% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.3% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 24.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 6 165 27" 2560 1440 DEL41D9 DELL S2721DGF
Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 1,470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,266
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $300Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11400F $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback