Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive305% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '21 at 09:22
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 300
101% 183 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 807
82% 666 Pts
64-Core 822
51% 822 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 150
Parallax 139
119% 145 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 145
Splatting 126
106% 130 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1858 1895 1843 1244 526 515 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,226
Write 1,624
Mixed 1,009
SusWrite 1,314
344% 1,543 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 69.2
238% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,599
DQ Write 1,214
DQ Mixed 1,252
978% 1,355 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 305%
Great: 363%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178
604GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 120 120 121 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 131
Write 116
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 120
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
216% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 98%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
902GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 143 137 142 141 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 137
Write 136
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 140
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
182% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB-$351
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 29.9
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 31.8
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $910
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback