Huawei MACH-WX9

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Huawei MACH-WX9 (all builds)
Motherboard	HUAWEI MACH-WX9-PCB
Memory	5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3000 x 2000 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210512
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '21 at 09:13
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	7%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8550U 184,356 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	48.3% Average	Memory 38.1 1-Core 112 2-Core 191 60% 114 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 462 48% 388 Pts	64-Core 344 21% 344 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia MX150-2 5,332 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Device(19E5 3E04) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9910 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Lighting 12.4 Reflection 16.5 Parallax 14.8 10% 14.6 fps	MRender 13.5 Gravity 13.9 Splatting 13.7 11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 533 516 495 509 518 507 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 474 Mixed 472 SusWrite 513 111% 492 MB/s	4K Read 55 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 80.4 242% 80 MB/s	DQ Read 824 DQ Write 650 DQ Mixed 574 474% 683 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 435%
Seagate Basic 2TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 582GB free, PID aa14 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 31 Mixed 30.7 SusWrite 33.9 44% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT52L1G32D4PG-093 2x8GB 14,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.7% Average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 13.2 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 12.5 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 212 19% 212 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MACH-WX9 Builds (Compare 833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Huawei MACH-WX9

CPU
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	710x
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	123x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	634x
MX150-2NvidiaBench 11%, 5,332 samples	179x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	3x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	222x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	205x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	185x

RAM
MT52L1G32D4PG-093 2x8GBMicronBench 66%, 14,288 samples	395x
MT52L512M32D2PF-09 2x4GBMicronBench 67%, 6,726 samples	117x
K4EBE304EB-EGCG 2x8GBSamsungBench 64%, 14,699 samples	111x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16