MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	66.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

System	Micro-Star MS-7C51
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201208
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '21 at 20:04
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$82 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Memory 85.8 1-Core 144 2-Core 285 94% 172 Pts	4-Core 521 8-Core 894 86% 707 Pts	64-Core 1,118 69% 1,118 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.5% Good	Lighting 86.5 Reflection 113 Parallax 68.4 70% 89.2 fps	MRender 65.5 Gravity 78.8 Splatting 70.6 59% 71.6 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR041 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 96 94 35 153 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 511 Write 444 Mixed 15.6 SusWrite 99.7 59% 267 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 0.3 40% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 29.1 48% 93.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 901GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 171 179 181 181 181 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 149 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 175 93% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 107%
PI-239 USB 2.0 Drive 320GB 273 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 101GB free, PID 1840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 35 35 35 36 36 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 32 Mixed 18.4 SusWrite 35 41% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4W.16FE 1x16GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 24.4 72% 25 GB/s	SC Read 25.4 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 25.4 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	533x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	478x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	384x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	311x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	227x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	222x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	219x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	204x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	101x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 43%, 3,974 samples	126x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	97x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	84x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $280

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16