Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '21 at 12:36
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$250
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 71
1-Core 160
2-Core 303
94% 178 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 1,050
97% 812 Pts
64-Core 1,985
123% 1,985 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.76
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 106
Reflection 91.4
Parallax 107
87% 102 fps
Gravity 184
Splatting 140
141% 162 fps
Poor: 128% Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 140 134 145 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 339
Write 125
Mixed 133
SusWrite 141
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 18.4
68% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 129
108% 159 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 122%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
29GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,309
Write 1,744
Mixed 1,520
412% 1,858 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 85
281% 98.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,369
DQ Write 870
DQ Mixed 1,144
846% 1,128 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 63 29 29 21 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 101
Write 97.8
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 47
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 90%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB
22GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 20 19 20 22 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 135
Write 22.4
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 18.7
50% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.3
166% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3000C15-8GVS F4-3600C16-8GVKC F4-3000C15-8GVS F4-3600C16-8GVKC 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.7% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 20.5
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 21.5
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $908
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback