Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120615
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '21 at 08:06
Run Duration	295 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 90.4 2-Core 181 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 269 35% 266 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 18.8 Parallax 19.2 15% 18.9 fps	MRender 16.3 Gravity 19.5 Splatting 17.5 15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 229 217 220 207 205 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.1% Good	Read 256 Write 237 Mixed 203 SusWrite 203 51% 225 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 28.8 103% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 171 135% 188 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 128%
Samsung D3 Station 2TB 2,805 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 952GB free, PID 6123 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 24 22 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 24.8 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 21.7 33% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 80%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 16GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 7.4 15 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 32 Write 17.8 Mixed 18 SusWrite 11.6 24% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.3 121% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 16GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 17.6 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 11.7 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	379x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	335x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	48x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16