HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '21 at 08:06
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 183
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 244
36% 257 Pts
64-Core 371
25% 371 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 19.2
15% 18.9 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 17.5
15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 16%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 229 217 220 207 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.1% Good
Read 256
Write 237
Mixed 203
SusWrite 203
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 28.8
103% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 171
135% 188 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 128%
Samsung D3 Station 2TB
952GB free, PID 6123
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 24 22 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 24.8
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 21.7
33% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 80%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
16GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 7.4 15 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 32
Write 17.8
Mixed 18
SusWrite 11.6
24% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.3
121% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 17.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 4,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $300Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $300Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback