Sony VPCCA35FG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony VPCCA35FG  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '21 at 03:26
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 85.1
1-Core 77
2-Core 130
61% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 184
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EYOTA-128GB 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R0258
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 105 176 135 139 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 376
Write 316
Mixed 319
SusWrite 143
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 26.1
94% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 141
119% 169 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
294GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 103 103 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 101
Write 104
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 103
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback