Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '21 at 10:05
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 238
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 680
69% 561 Pts
64-Core 671
42% 671 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.1% Outstanding
Lighting 105
Reflection 142
Parallax 94.3
86% 114 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 121
Splatting 104
104% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1123 839 832 841 838 844 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,906
Write 1,602
Mixed 1,551
SusWrite 886
333% 1,487 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 74.9
264% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,290
DQ Write 936
DQ Mixed 1,062
807% 1,096 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 261%
Great: 297%
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
35GB free
Firmware: 57XA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 299 326 280 275 275 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,041
Write 305
Mixed 786
SusWrite 310
135% 610 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 56.1
209% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 823
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 636
453% 592 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 150%
Great: 207%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 162 163 163 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 151
Mixed 108
SusWrite 163
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
219% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 28.3
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 28.4
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 54.5
73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $664
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback