Performance Results


Gaming 137% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 127% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B17
Motherboard	MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B17) (all builds)
Memory	24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '21 at 16:42
Run Duration	410 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Memory 79.1 1-Core 144 2-Core 283 91% 169 Pts	4-Core 570 8-Core 949 93% 760 Pts	64-Core 1,033 64% 1,033 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% MSI(1462 3903) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	152% Outstanding	Lighting 225 Reflection 210 Parallax 203 184% 213 fps	MRender 194 Gravity 152 Splatting 136 129% 161 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 53 72 55 57 60 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.4% Below average	Read 0.2 Write 29.4 Mixed 171 SusWrite 64 15% 66.1 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 36.4 4K Mixed 21.8 79% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 34.8 DQ Mixed 33.4 40% 72 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 78%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 2,797 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 272 375 300 351 369 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 63.1 Write 322 Mixed 55.1 SusWrite 323 44% 191 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 80.6 4K Mixed 21.6 86% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 103 98% 154 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 134%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 278GB free Firmware: RVT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 120 104 110 242 160 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.5% Poor	Read 114 Write 120 Mixed 104 SusWrite 160 28% 125 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 11 4K Mixed 6.4 20% 7.2 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 134 106% 147 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 4x8GB 20,502 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	56.4% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 18 58% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.2 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 126%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 106%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	576x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	532x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	460x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	545x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	351x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	310x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	286x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	275x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	216x

Value: 116% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,121

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16