Asus P8H61-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M LE (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130918
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '21 at 08:38
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 94.6 2-Core 182 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 349 46% 348 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.76 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Lighting 33.6 Reflection 35.9 Parallax 33.7 27% 34.4 fps	MRender 36.5 Gravity 34.1 Splatting 24.1 25% 31.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 222 192 192 188 185 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	68.3% Good	Read 250 Write 238 Mixed 236 SusWrite 189 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 37.8 120% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 201 151% 201 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 278GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 144 143 145 142 144 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Read 147 Write 139 Mixed 85.6 SusWrite 140 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Samsung M378B5773SB0-CK0 10GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 2048 MB Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 10.5 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 10.9 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	163x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	110x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	83x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	158x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	79x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	29x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	28x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	20x
859B CT51264BA160B.C16F 8GBUnknownBench 53%, 62 samples	18x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $211

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16