Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 18:03
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 65.6
1-Core 149
2-Core 291
89% 169 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 848
84% 684 Pts
64-Core 1,242
77% 1,242 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 38
Reflection 42.6
Parallax 39.4
31% 40 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 28.2
28% 35.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$54
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 889 736 98 106 93 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 943
Write 742
Mixed 908
SusWrite 336
164% 732 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 50.3
172% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 793
DQ Mixed 714
556% 761 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 146%
Great: 239%
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155
69GB free
Firmware: 1.3.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 129 120 131 131 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 312
Write 140
Mixed 189
SusWrite 130
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 29.3
99% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 160
120% 161 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 83%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
649GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1913 2117 2143 2153 1445 347 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 1,614
Write 1,783
Mixed 1,436
SusWrite 1,686
368% 1,630 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 59.8
200% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,199
DQ Write 975
DQ Mixed 1,065
803% 1,079 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 278%
Great: 365%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
376GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 103 102 105 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 184
Write 184
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 102
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST3500641AS 500GB-$76
221GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 55.6
Write 34.9
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 44.6
33% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.3% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25.6
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 20.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $740
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback