Today's hottest deals

Casper EXCALIBUR G770

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G770  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER G770 001
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 10:30
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 188
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 437
46% 369 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Quanta(152D 1199) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 6.2
4% 24.4 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 9.1
6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8120G 120GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 79 111 70 46 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 425
Write 248
Mixed 298
SusWrite 92.4
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 27.6
110% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 184
160% 235 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 87%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB
841GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 140 140 124 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 140
Write 137
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 133
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.6
237% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD8266.C16FE 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 13.8
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EXCALIBUR G770 Builds (Compare 3,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback