Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180122
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 15 '21 at 21:37
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$218
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 46.7
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 158
55% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 260
38% 276 Pts
64-Core 256
17% 256 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Gigabyte(1458 230A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1189 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.11.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 22.1
13% 18.3 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 14.3
13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 13%
Great: 23%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 30 38 35 48 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 319
Write 55.9
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 37.7
22% 104 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 13.6
40% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 52%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
443GB free
Firmware: JU002U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 116 114 114 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
60% Above average
Read 92
Write 105
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 116
61% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
176% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60%
Great: 80%
Toshiba MK4058GSX 400GB
26GB free
Firmware: FF012A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 54 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 49.3
Write 49.6
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 54.7
32% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.5% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 17.4
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 14.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D2C C24F390
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 45,364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $65

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $626
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $289Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-12400F $184Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $248Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback