Lenovo 80Q1

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Lenovo 80Q1 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Ares
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161125
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '21 at 16:36
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	42%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6820HK 20,362 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 85.2 1-Core 88.1 2-Core 143 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 513 49% 406 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M 10,379 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Legend(17AA 3803) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.5% Below average	Lighting 45.2 Reflection 57.9 Parallax 50.4 37% 51.2 fps	MRender 57.7 Gravity 50.3 Splatting 47.2 42% 51.7 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVPV128HDGM-000L2 128GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6L0QBXW7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 554 Write 513 Mixed 322 103% 463 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 37.9 134% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 733 DQ Write 211 DQ Mixed 375 302% 440 MB/s
Poor: 120% Great: 196%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 144GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1010 592 571 567 555 547 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	237% Outstanding	Read 2,326 Write 1,850 Mixed 1,739 SusWrite 640 366% 1,639 MB/s	4K Read 56.7 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 73.1 240% 81.4 MB/s	DQ Read 777 DQ Write 570 DQ Mixed 611 474% 653 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 237% Great: 355%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$40 57,200 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 862GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 112 112 111 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 88.2 Write 86.5 Mixed 51.1 SusWrite 110 62% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB 55,289 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	72.5% Very good	MC Read 27 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 23.6 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 25.3 SC Mixed 17.1 53% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 80Q1 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

System: Lenovo 80Q1

CPU
Core i7-6820HKIntelBench 69%, 20,362 samples	36x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GTX 980MNvidiaBench 39%, 10,379 samples	39x

SSD
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $31Bench 183%, 9,202 samples	5x
MZVPV256HDGL-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 184%, 29 samples	4x
MZVPV512HDGL-000L2 512GBSamsungBench 207%, 50 samples	4x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	15x
M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 20,956 samples	6x
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 70%, 4,393 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $31

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16