HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8390
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '21 at 11:58
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 202
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 399
50% 379 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 75%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
HP(103C 8390) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.3% Average
Lighting 51.8
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 55.9
42% 57.2 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 55.9
Splatting 57.8
48% 59.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA1-8D256-HP 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A182
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 275 254 261 258 253 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 1,002
Write 298
Mixed 388
SusWrite 269
107% 489 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 38.5
157% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 655
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 326
265% 389 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 123%
Great: 170%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
168GB free
Firmware: SBFKKB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 397 430 433 451 450 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 204
Write 106
Mixed 237
SusWrite 414
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 6.7
47% 12 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 102%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
99GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 54 68 68 67 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 132
Write 116
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 64.4
102% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FDD1 Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 23.8
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 24
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback